Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 233 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 4% better in Borderlands 3 than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 209 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 54 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
209
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Single-Core
644
61.863592699327576%
Multi-Core
2356
100%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |