Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 3403 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 26% better in Valorant than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 884 vs 700 FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €103.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66732 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Single-Core
644
28.270412642669008%
Multi-Core
2356
30.435344270766052%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |