Buy on Amazon
€248
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $221
Availability
MSRP in USD: $221
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms Xeon E5-1607 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-1607 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-1607 v3 - 165 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i5-13400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
165
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€248
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-13400, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 10 core (6 P-core + 4 E-core) Cache 20 MB, fino a 4,6 GHz
Buy for €248 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-1607 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i5-13400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Xeon E5-1607 v3 or Core i5-13400
Red Dead Redemption 2, 1920 x 1080, Highest
55 FPS
€18.18/FPS
GeForce RTX 4060
Core i5-13400
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€999.9
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
