Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms Xeon E5-1607 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 3403 days newer than Xeon E5-1607 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 34% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 156 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 24 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
156
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€359.03
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €359.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57806 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Single-Core
518
19.466366027809094%
Multi-Core
1607
10.384491114701131%
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |