Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms Xeon E5-1607 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1211 days newer than Xeon E5-1607 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 14% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 104 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
104
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€141.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €141.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |