Buy on Amazon
€60.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Xeon E5-1607 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 721 days newer than Xeon E5-1607 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Dota 2 than Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 171 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Xeon E5-1607 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
