Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon E3-1575M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2537 days newer than Xeon E3-1575M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 11% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 146 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 16 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€211
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €211 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16767 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 24th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |