Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms Xeon E3-1535M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 2626 days newer than Xeon E3-1535M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 18% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 123 vs 104 FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
123
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€107.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €107.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10288 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |