Buy on Amazon
€20
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $434
Availability
MSRP in USD: $434
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1505M v5 outperforms Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1505M v5 is 1752 days newer than Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-2400 - 127 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Intel CORE I5-2400 3.10GHZ SKT1155 6MB CACHE BOXED, BX80623I52400 (SKT1155 6MB CACHE BOXED)
Buy for €20 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65532 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E3-1505M v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
554
47.43150684931507%
Multi-Core
1607
44.90081028220173%
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.