Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Xeon E3-1285L v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 1457 days newer than Xeon E3-1285L v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 565 vs 544 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E |
Broadwell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 45 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
No | Overclockable | No |