Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4580 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 22 than Xeon E3-1280 - 289 vs 258 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
289
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€483.36
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €483.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |