Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 3315 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E3-1280 - 160 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€275.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €275.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3444 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |