Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 3017 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 16% better in Sea of Thieves than Xeon E3-1280 - 245 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 12 vs 8 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Xeon E3-1280
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Ryzen 5 3600XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
