Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1280 v5 outperforms Core i5-2320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1280 v5 is 1506 days newer than Core i5-2320.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than Core i5-2320 - 151 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-2320 - 80 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2320 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2320
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
145
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.19
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 | vs | Intel Core i5-2320 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |