Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1280 v5 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1280 v5 is 48 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5
- Performs up to 6% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron G3900 - 484 vs 455 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 - 51 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
455
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 308 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |