Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1280 v3 outperforms Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1280 v3 is 875 days newer than Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-2600S - 173 vs 168 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 65 vs 82 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
168
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600S |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
82 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |