Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10875H outperforms Xeon E3-1280 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10875H is 2496 days newer than Xeon E3-1280 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10875H
- Performs up to 8% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 573 vs 532 FPS
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 45 vs 82 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1280 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i7-10875H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-10875H |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2020 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 82 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
