Buy on Amazon
€220.97
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms Xeon E3-1280 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2524 days newer than Xeon E3-1280 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 82 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 193 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Intel Core i5-10600K, processore desktop, 4.1 GHz 12 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for €220.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65461 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E3-1280 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i5-10600K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1280 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1193
71.95416164053076%
Multi-Core
3874
56.65399239543726%
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
82 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.