Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 1655 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 80 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 5% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E3-1275 v5 - 183 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5 - 20 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€331.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €331.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7432 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |