Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 3789 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Xeon E3-1275 v3 - 211 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E3-1275 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i9-14900KF
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| 84 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
