Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600K outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8600K is 1970 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i5-8600K - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600K - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 13% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 134 vs 119 FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€256.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €256.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-8600K |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD P4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |