Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1270 v3 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1270 v3 is 1766 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3
- Performs up to 11% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G4900 - 177 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 54 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E3-1270 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
