Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7800X outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7800X is 1869 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Core i7-7800X - 45 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7800X
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 151 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1265L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i7-7800X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-7800X |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
