Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600 outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600 is 3887 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600
- Performs up to 13% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 190 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 20 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E3-1265L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i5-13600
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600 |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 14 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
