Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3897 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 44% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 158 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
158
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€198
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €198 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |