Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6400 outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6400 is 3315 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 45 vs 58 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Xeon E3-1260L - 147 vs 145 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |