Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 4304 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 12% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E3-1260L - 167 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 12 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€195.01
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €195.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |