Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms Xeon E3-1245 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 3315 days newer than Xeon E3-1245.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1245 - 136 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1245 - 12 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€164.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €164.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13250 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1245 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |