Buy on Amazon
€271.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 3315 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 23% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E3-1240 - 135 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-10700K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.01/FPS
100%
Price, €
€271.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-10700K, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 8 core fino a 5,1 GHz sbloccato LGA1200 (chipset Intel® serie 400) 125 W
Buy for €271.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E3-1240
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Core i7-10700K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
