Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 3504 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 41% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E3-1240 - 646 vs 457 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 12 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
646
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€136.11
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €136.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |