Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 3003 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v5.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 15% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 337 vs 292 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 32 vs 8 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Single-Core
1310
43.377483443708606%
Multi-Core
4192
22.94471811713191%
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |