Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2524 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Remnant II than Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 91 vs 85 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 20 vs 8 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
91
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€272.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €272.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4434 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |