Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 847 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 69 vs 85 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in Far Cry 3 than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 129 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell-E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 85 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |