Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 3228 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Performs up to 9% better in F1 23 than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 178 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 58 vs 69 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
178
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.51
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 423 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
69 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |