Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 3522 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 21% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 277 vs 229 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 65 vs 69 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
277
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€205.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €205.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-12500 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |