Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E3-1230 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 4302 days newer than Xeon E3-1230.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1230
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 80 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 51% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1230 - 139 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1230 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1230 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
139
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€723.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €723.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1230 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 150 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |