Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100 outperforms Xeon E3-1230 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100 is 2708 days newer than Xeon E3-1230.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1230
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E3-1230 - 242 vs 231 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1230 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1230 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1230
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Core i3-9100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1230 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
