Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Xeon E3-1230 vs Celeron G3900

Xeon E3-1230 vs Celeron G3900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Xeon E3-1230 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1230 is 1612 days older than Celeron G3900.

Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1230

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads

Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900

  • Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1230 - 51 vs 80 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1230 doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of Far Cry 6.
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Xeon E3-1230 Logo
Xeon E3-1230

Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011


FPS

95

100%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


FPS

95

100%

Value, €/FPS

€0.64/FPS

100%

Price, €

€60.9

100%

Value Winner

Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray

Buy for 60.9 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 24 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Xeon E3-1230 Logo
Xeon E3-1230

Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Xeon E3-1230 Logo
Xeon E3-1230

Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011


Single-Core

588

100%

Multi-Core

1975

100%

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


Single-Core

581

98%

Multi-Core

992

50%

Intel Xeon E3-1230 Logo

Intel Xeon E3-1230

vs
Intel Celeron G3900 Logo

Intel Celeron G3900

Apr 3rd, 2011Release Date
Sep 1st, 2015
Xeon E3CollectionCeleron
Sandy BridgeCodenameSkylake
Intel Socket 1155SocketIntel Socket 1151
Server
Segment
Desktop
4
Cores2
8
Threads2
3.2 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.8 GHz
3.6 GHzTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
80 WTDP
51 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
32.0x
Multiplier28.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
Intel HD 510
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.