Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Xeon E3-1230 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 3158 days newer than Xeon E3-1230.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1230
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 80 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 8% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Xeon E3-1230 - 119 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1230 - 48 vs 8 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1230 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 48 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 280 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |