Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Xeon E3-1230 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 2634 days newer than Xeon E3-1230 v5.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E3-1230 v5 - 227 vs 202 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€544.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €544.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |