Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1230 v5 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1230 v5 is 1050 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5
- Performs up to 7% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G1610 - 291 vs 273 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 - 55 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
273
93.81443298969072%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44038 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
33.35943617854346%
Multi-Core
739
17.68788894207755%
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |