Buy on Amazon
€450
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $250
Availability
MSRP in USD: $250
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Xeon E3-1230 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2524 days newer than Xeon E3-1230 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 6% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E3-1230 v3 - 136 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i9-10900 processor 2.8 GHz 20 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for €450 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66730 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1230 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1230 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1135
66.60798122065728%
Multi-Core
3696
43.89027431421446%
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.