Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms Xeon E3-1226 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 751 days newer than Xeon E3-1226 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 84 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 0% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E3-1226 v3 - 216 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3 - 16 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • May 11th, 2014
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell, Haswell-WS | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |