Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Xeon E3-1226 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 1883 days newer than Xeon E3-1226 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 84 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 5% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E3-1226 v3 - 171 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3 - 12 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Xeon E3-1226 v3
Server/Workstation • May 11th, 2014
Ryzen 5 3600X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell, Haswell-WS | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
