Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1226 v3 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1226 v3 is 942 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3
- Performs up to 6% better in God of War than FX-6100 - 171 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 84 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3 - 6 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 11th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
Haswell, Haswell-WS | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |