Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms Xeon E3-1225 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 3929 days newer than Xeon E3-1225.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 35% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1225 - 124 vs 92 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 12 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
124
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€201.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €201.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Single-Core
568
24.578104716572913%
Multi-Core
1693
18.647428130851416%
Intel Xeon E3-1225 | vs | Intel Core i5-12500 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |