Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Xeon E3-1225 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1612 days newer than Xeon E3-1225.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E3-1225 - 119 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
119
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €35.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |