Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1225 v3 outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1225 v3 is 7 days older than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3
- Performs up to 9% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-3250 - 246 vs 226 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 55 vs 84 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E3-1225 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i3-3250
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 84 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
