Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2400S outperforms Xeon E3-1220L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2400S is 491 days older than Xeon E3-1220L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400S - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 116 vs 115 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
116
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |