Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Xeon E3-1220 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2150 days newer than Xeon E3-1220 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 0% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 463 vs 461 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 54 vs 69 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1220 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 69 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
